Understanding American Express Chargeback Reason Code P07: Late Submission

Reason code P07 arises when a merchant initially obtains authorisation for a payment, but presents it late. The issuer, therefore, views it as expired and credits the cardholder. Common causes for this type of dispute include late batches and system delays, as well as intentional holds.

Key Takeaways

• What it means: The charge was submitted after the authorisation expired, so Amex refused to honour it.
• Causes: Batch delays. Expired authorisations. Account changes. Long holds.
• How to respond: Prove timely presentment or show a matching credit. Otherwise, accept the chargeback.
• How to prevent: Submit the same day. Reauthorise if delayed. Use incremental/estimated authorisations.

What is an American Express Reason Code P07 Chargeback?

Reason Code P07 is categorised by American Express as a processing error. An authorisation was obtained, but the transaction was not presented to the issuer within the required timeframe. Authorisation confirms the card is valid and funds are available at that moment. It does not move money. Settlement only happens when you submit the transaction, often via a daily batch. If you wait too long, the authorisation can lapse. 

The issuer may also change the account status during the delay, rendering the original approval invalid. P07 chargebacks can affect both in-store and remote payments. Industries that place authorisation holds are at high risk. Examples include hotels, vehicle rental or fuel sales. It's not about product quality or unfamiliar charges; it is strictly a matter of missing a key deadline. 

Primary Causes for a Code P07 Chargeback

Several operational situations trigger late submission. The most common is delayed batching. Many businesses still close their register and send a single file at the end of the day. If a system glitch holds that batch for an extra day, yesterday’s sales may already be outside the allowed limit. Another frequent cause centres on authorisation holds, often used by hotels, petrol stations or hire firms. If the final bill is not submitted before the hold expires, the authorisation becomes void. 

Subscription merchants face similar risk when a customer asks to delay the first payment until a specific date. Unless a fresh authorisation is obtained on the agreed day, the original approval may have expired. Account changes also come into play. If the cardholder’s account is closed or the card is reissued between authorisation and presentment, the transaction will fail. Finally, a number of friendly-fraud claims turn up under this code. A cardholder forgets about an earlier delay request and disputes the charge. This prompts the issuer to file P07 even though the merchant believed the timing had been agreed upon. Each cause boils down to one factor: the clock ran out.

Time Limit for Disputing an American Express Reason Code P07 Chargeback

The time limit to respond is short. American Express allows the acquirer or merchant 20 days from the date of the chargeback to submit a response. This window includes acquirer handling time, so your actual window may be only a few days. Act immediately when a notification arrives. Build your case with timestamps that show both authorisation and presentation occurred within the permitted period. Settlement batch logs, gateway reports, and processor records can be helpful.

If you issued a credit that offsets the disputed amount, include proof of the refund and the exact value returned. In many industries, authorisations expire within seven to ten days. Some holds in hospitality can be adjusted for longer under specific programme rules. If records indicate that the presentment occurred late, fighting the claim is unlikely to succeed. Accepting the chargeback can be the right call to avoid further fees.

What P07 Means for Consumers & Issuers

A P07 case typically arises without the consumer's involvement. What it means is that the merchant obtained an authorisation but sent the transaction for settlement after the permitted period. The issuer then reverses the charge because the approval was no longer valid. On a statement, the customer may see a pending amount that drops off, or a charge that appears later than expected and is then credited back. Clear notices about when billing will occur, and receipts that state expected settlement dates, reduce questions.

For issuers, P07 is a timing breach under scheme rules. An authorisation confirms funds at a point in time; it is not an open‑ended promise to pay. If presentment arrives after the window, or the account has changed status, the issuer rejects it and returns the funds. In sectors such as hospitality or car hire, issuers will look at whether the merchant used the correct estimated or incremental authorisation flow and settled within those parameters. If the records support timely handling under those rules, the chargeback can be withdrawn; if not, the credit stands.

What P07 Means for Merchants

For merchants, P07 highlights a timing gap that can directly affect income. The practical effect is lost sales, potential acquirer fees, extra handling work, and stock or services delivered without payment. Repeated late presentments can lift your dispute ratio and may invite closer review from your processor. The key lesson that merchants should take from receiving this type of chargeback is to pay attention to their internal processes, which may need tighter controls to protect revenue.

Train staff on cut-off times and the difference between authorisation, capture, and settlement. Monitor batches and set alerts for failed transmissions. If your systems are prone to outages, introduce redundancy and daily checks. Treat P07 cases as process issues rather than customer disputes. Adjust workflows, not wording, to protect revenue and reduce repeat events.

How to Respond to a Code P07 Chargeback

Start by checking timestamps. Compare the authorisation date and time against the settlement presentment time. If presentment occurred within the permitted window, compile evidence including:

• Authorisation response 
• Batch detail report
• Gateway logs
• Processor confirmation
• Receipts

Include any customer communications that clarify the timing. Submit a clear letter explaining why the presentment was timely, tying each document to a specific timestamp.

If you have issued a credit for the full disputed amount, include the refund reference and posting date. If the credit is partial, explain the difference and the contract terms that justify the partial credit. When the records indicate a late presentment, contesting will rarely be successful. Accept the chargeback, review the root cause, and update your processes to prevent recurrence. Keep responses factual, concise and on point. Issuers and American Express reviewers focus on timing and evidence, not intentions. 

Proactive Prevention: The Ultimate Defence

Process improvements are the key to avoiding P07 chargebacks. Submit transactions the same day as the sale, wherever possible. When delays are unavoidable, ensure you reauthorise before presentation. Use estimated and incremental authorisations in hospitality, rentals, and services with variable totals. Implement automated batch closing to ensure this happens consistently and on time, even on weekends or bank holidays. Keep descriptors clear and consistent so statements match expectations. Finally, try out chargeback alerts to be aware of incoming disputes as early as possible. 

‍